Friday, July 22, 2005
Frogmarch watch: Here comes the Rovian counterstrike
From Julian Borger in the Guardian. Last paragraph:
Of course, Seymour Hersh had this story in 2003, back... Although with a slightly diffent twist.
The logic is going to be just the same as the Rovian counterstrike on Bush being AWOL from TANG: Because the Killian memos were not provably true, all the other evidence on Bush being AWOL is false. (Say, has anyone ever collected the $10,000 reward for saying saying Bush was actually serving his country during his missing year?)
And in this case: Former CIA traitors deceived Bush in this one case, therefore CIA traitors deceived Bush in all cases...
Meanwhile, a parallel investigation is under way into who forged the Niger documents. They are known to have been passed to an Italian journalist by a former Italian defence intelligence officer, Rocco Martino, in October 2002, but their origins have remained a mystery. Mr Martino has insisted to the Italian press that he was "a tool used by someone for games much bigger than me", but has not specified who that might be.
A source familiar with the inquiry said investigators were examining whether former US intelligence agents may have been involved in possible collaboration with Iraqi exiles determined to prove that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear programme.
(via Guardian)
Of course, Seymour Hersh had this story in 2003, back... Although with a slightly diffent twist.
The logic is going to be just the same as the Rovian counterstrike on Bush being AWOL from TANG: Because the Killian memos were not provably true, all the other evidence on Bush being AWOL is false. (Say, has anyone ever collected the $10,000 reward for saying saying Bush was actually serving his country during his missing year?)
And in this case: Former CIA traitors deceived Bush in this one case, therefore CIA traitors deceived Bush in all cases...