Monday, January 03, 2005
Framing the Social Security debate
Seems like the WOCM [Winger Or Cowardly Media... ] is framing the Social Security debate as "Reform" (ie, phaseout) vs. "transition costs" (borrowing the trillions to do the phaseout).
Wouldn't framing it as "Republican looting" versus "retirement with dignity" be a more truthful approach?
Wouldn't framing it as "Republican looting" versus "retirement with dignity" be a more truthful approach?