corrente

Nedra Pickler, everyone's favorite "Republican-in-reporter's-clothing," is back. Here's her latest "contribution" to the election coverage:

WASHINGTON - John Kerry on Saturday looked to frame the next presidential debate in a specriticizing President Bush's economic record, but also tried to get in a final word about their last face-off by declaring himself the winner and Bush a liar. "George Bush lost the debate," an announcer says in a television ad Kerry's campaign unveiled Saturday. "Now he's lying about it."
(via AP)

Now, aside from the fact that Nedra's apparently a lousy writer and that the A.P. doesn't employ copy-editors anymore (specriticizing?), Nedra's not-so-subtle assertion is that Kerry's a hypocrite for calling W a liar within a couple of days of saying he wouldn't do so.

Okay, so now you have to go watch the ads. W's is here. Kerry's is here. I'll wait.

Okay, folks, what do you call it when someone twists another's words to assert they said something they didn't say? It's called LYING, isn't it boys and girls? If George W. Bush's campaign did that, they'd be lying about what happened in the debate, wouldn't they?

I'm sorry Nedra, you tool, but you didn't point that rather simple fact out. You took what was clearly a falsehood uttered by the Bush campaign and, like the good stenographer you are, wrote what the Bush campaign wanted you to write.

I guess the saddest thing here is that W and the boys were transparently lying about what Kerry said in the debate. It's almost like these guys can't go a whole day without lying.

Why didn't Nedra just say that, huh?

I think you and I know the answer, don't we?

Pathetic.

Liberal media my, uh, hind foot.