Tuesday, April 27, 2004
Iraq insurgency: Najf and Sadr
A nice take from the essential Juan Cole:
The savage wars of peace.
How many sides are there to the occupation, anyhow? Sadr, Badr ... No matter how many there are, they're all playing both ends against the middle. Eesh.
Since the Badr Corps of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq had control of the shrine of Imam Ali before the Sadrist uprising of early April, and since it still is helping patrol Karbala, my own guess is that Badr has deliberately pulled back in hopes that the Mahdi Army and the Americans will weaken each other. The hope that other Najaf forces will take care of Muqtada al-Sadr for the US seems to me forlorn. The Najafis hate Muqtada and his militiamen, who are not from Najaf on the whole. On the other hand, no Shiite clerical figure can possibly want to see the US drag Muqtada away in chains, since that would inevitably weaken the clerical authorities.
(via Informed Comment)
The savage wars of peace.
How many sides are there to the occupation, anyhow? Sadr, Badr ... No matter how many there are, they're all playing both ends against the middle. Eesh.