Wednesday, February 25, 2004
Wouldn't "anti-marriage for gay people" be a lot less Orwellian than "defense of marriage"?
Just asking.
Since I still don't understand what it is, exactly, that's being defended.
Why is it that, when John, married to Mary, commits adultery with Marie, marriage doesn't need to be defended, but when Jules wants to marry Jim, it does?
Since I still don't understand what it is, exactly, that's being defended.
Why is it that, when John, married to Mary, commits adultery with Marie, marriage doesn't need to be defended, but when Jules wants to marry Jim, it does?
