Saturday, September 20, 2003
They even lie about the medals for the war
From a letter by Dorothy Michael in my own Inky:
Hmmm... Iraq part of the "Global War on Terrorism." But... But... Didn't our faabulous Dear Leader just tell His People that:
And isn't it true that the only intelligence that Saddam was involved in terror is faith-based?
And doesn't it look like this "generic" medal means that the Pentagon and the Bush Gang are gearing up for one, two, many Iraqs?
I'd like to see some of the recipients of these medals throwing them over the White House fence, as Kerry (give him credit) among others did during the Viet Nam war.
YABL, YABL, YABL. No matter how deep you sink a shovel into this crap, it's never deep enough, is it?
President Bush recently honored the Army unit that led the attack on Baghdad, awarding it a well-deserved presidential unit citation for "extraordinary heroism." Formal recognition of military service is so important for the morale of the troops.
I am concerned, though, that there will be no specific campaign medals for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Participants in these campaigns will get a generic "Global War on Terrorism" service/expeditionary medal.
Hmmm... Iraq part of the "Global War on Terrorism." But... But... Didn't our faabulous Dear Leader just tell His People that:
We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th.
And isn't it true that the only intelligence that Saddam was involved in terror is faith-based?
And doesn't it look like this "generic" medal means that the Pentagon and the Bush Gang are gearing up for one, two, many Iraqs?
I'd like to see some of the recipients of these medals throwing them over the White House fence, as Kerry (give him credit) among others did during the Viet Nam war.
YABL, YABL, YABL. No matter how deep you sink a shovel into this crap, it's never deep enough, is it?
