Thursday, September 04, 2003
Let's you and him fight!
D'Arcy Dornan of AP writes:
The adminstration keeps saying this, but I don't see why it's an attractive proposition for the international forces. It sounds like we're saying "We're tired of getting shot at so close to the 2004 election, and besides we don't have the money, so why don't you come get shot at?" Maybe some Booblican can clarify?
The top U.S. commander in Iraq said Thursday he needs more international forces to deal with potential security threats but he and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld both emphasized that they do not see a need for more U.S. troops.
The adminstration keeps saying this, but I don't see why it's an attractive proposition for the international forces. It sounds like we're saying "We're tired of getting shot at so close to the 2004 election, and besides we don't have the money, so why don't you come get shot at?" Maybe some Booblican can clarify?
