Sunday, August 31, 2003
Bush not poll-driven? Oh, puh-leeze...
Kathryn Dunn Tenpas does a quantitative analysis of the Bush political operation based on public records and gives the results in "Words and Deeds":
Say one thing, do another? The Bush administration? Who knew?!
Boiling it down: Blotchy's gang just don't want to be caught doing it, that's all. Think Unka Karl never picks up the phone?
President Bush's use of polling is by no means pathbreaking, nor is the amount of polling particularly astounding. What is unusual about the Bush team's polling operation is the chasm between its words and actions. Never before has a White House engaged in such anti-polling rhetoric or built up such a buffer between the pollsters and the president. The placement of longtime Bush loyalist Dowd at the RNC to coordinate the polling means that the pollsters do not have contact with the White House. Such unusual behavior reflects a broader tension between a determined attempt to avoid the mistakes of Bush the elder—especially the failure after the Persian Gulf War to consider the implications of a stagnant economy for the 1992 reelection campaign—and a continuous effort to shed the vestiges of the Clinton administration. The Bush team fully understands the value of polling, but the perceived overuse of polling within the Clinton administration has led to serious overcompensation, which in turn has bred secrecy and denial.
Say one thing, do another? The Bush administration? Who knew?!
Boiling it down: Blotchy's gang just don't want to be caught doing it, that's all. Think Unka Karl never picks up the phone?